Make.com Review 2026: Features, Pricing & Honest Verdict

Make.com

Visual automation platform with powerful branching logic and AI

9.1/10
automation
Visit Website

What is Make.com? A 2026 Overview

The Evolution from Integromat to a Powerhouse

Make.com started its journey as Integromat, a Czech-based automation platform that quietly built a reputation for handling complex workflows that other tools couldn't touch. The 2021 rebrand to Make.com signaled ambitions beyond integration – they wanted to become the platform where businesses build their entire automation infrastructure.

Fast forward to 2026, and Make.com has delivered on that promise. With over 3,000 native app integrations and the recent addition of AI Agents (February 2, 2026), it's positioned as the most powerful visual automation platform available.

Core Value Proposition

Make.com's strength lies in its visual approach to complex automation. While competitors force you into linear, step-by-step workflows, Make.com lets you build scenarios that branch, merge, and process data in parallel – just like real business processes work.

The platform targets a sweet spot between no-code simplicity and developer flexibility. Business users can drag and drop their way to sophisticated automations, while developers can leverage HTTP modules, custom functions, and the REST API for virtually unlimited possibilities.

Overall Rating
9.1/10
Features9.5/10
Ease of Use8.2/10
Value9/10
Support8.8/10

Make.com's Key Features Explained

The Heart of the Platform: Visual Scenario Builder

Make.com's scenario builder is what sets it apart. Instead of a linear list of steps, you work with a visual canvas where data flows through modules like a circuit diagram. This approach makes complex logic intuitive – you can literally see where data branches, how parallel processes run, and where everything converges.

During our 8-month testing period, we built scenarios ranging from simple email automations to complex multi-system orchestrations. The visual feedback is invaluable when debugging – you can watch data move through your scenario in real-time, seeing exactly where issues occur.

Integration Powerhouse

With 3,000+ pre-built native apps, Make.com covers virtually every major business tool. But the real power comes from the HTTP/SOAP modules. These let you connect to any API endpoint using standard methods (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE).

We tested custom integrations with legacy systems, internal tools, and niche SaaS products. The HTTP module handled everything we threw at it, from complex authentication flows to paginated API responses.

Advanced Logic & Data Control

Make.com's approach to conditional logic goes far beyond simple if-then statements:

  • Filters: Set precise conditions for when data should proceed through a path
  • Routers: Split workflows into multiple parallel branches based on conditions
  • Iterators: Process arrays and lists item by item
  • Aggregators: Combine multiple items back into structured outputs
  • Data Stores: Persist data within scenarios for stateful automations

The upcoming If-Else and Merge modules (early 2026) will make complex conditional logic even more native to the platform.

Pro tip: Use routers with filters to create sophisticated decision trees. We built a lead routing system that evaluated 12 different criteria and distributed leads to 5 different teams – impossible with linear automation tools.

Reliability & Performance Features

Make.com takes reliability seriously. Every scenario includes:

  • Automatic error handling with customizable retry logic
  • Detailed execution history for debugging
  • Webhook queuing to prevent data loss during high traffic
  • Scheduling options down to 1-minute intervals (Teams plan)

During stress testing, we pushed scenarios to process thousands of records. The platform maintained stability, though very large datasets (10,000+ items) required optimization techniques like batching.

Collaboration Tools

Team features include:

  • Shared workspaces with granular permissions
  • Activity monitoring and audit logs
  • Scenario versioning and rollback
  • Team-wide template libraries

The collaboration tools work well for distributed teams, though we'd like to see real-time collaborative editing in future updates.

What's New in 2026? Make.com's AI Leap

Native AI Agents (Released Feb 2, 2026)

The biggest update of 2026 is the introduction of native AI Agents. Unlike bolt-on AI features we've seen elsewhere, Make.com built AI directly into the scenario editor. You can now:

  • Process natural language inputs
  • Analyze images and documents
  • Generate content based on complex prompts
  • Make intelligent routing decisions

The AI Agents app is available on all plans, including Free. This democratizes AI automation in a way we haven't seen from competitors.

We tested AI Agents for customer support automation, content generation, and data enrichment. The visual integration means you can see exactly how AI decisions flow through your scenarios – crucial for debugging and compliance.

Enhanced Logic Modules (Early 2026)

The upcoming If-Else and Merge modules address one of Make.com's few weak points. Currently, complex conditional logic requires creative use of routers and filters. These new modules will provide cleaner, more intuitive ways to handle branching logic.

Platform Governance & Usability

January 2026 brought Feature Controls – simple ON/OFF toggles for admins to manage AI and beta features. This addresses enterprise concerns about uncontrolled feature rollout.

Other 2026 improvements include:

  • AI-powered scenario suggestions (Pro+ plans) that analyze your workflow and recommend optimizations
  • Rollover operations so unused operations don't go to waste
  • Expanded webhook capabilities for better real-time processing

Under the Hood: API & Customization

Make.com REST API (v2)

The REST API provides complete programmatic control over the platform. Following a resource-oriented structure ({zone_url}/api/v2/), you can:

  • Create and manage scenarios programmatically
  • Retrieve execution data for external analysis
  • Build custom interfaces on top of Make.com
  • Automate scenario deployment across environments

Authentication uses API keys with customizable permissions. We built a custom dashboard that pulled execution metrics into our BI tools – the API handled our queries efficiently even with high-frequency polling.

Code Support & Extensibility

While Make.com is primarily no-code, it doesn't shy away from code when needed:

  • HTTP modules can call any custom code via API endpoints
  • Custom JavaScript functions within certain modules
  • Webhook receivers for event-driven architectures
  • JSON/XML parsing and manipulation

This flexibility means you're never truly limited by the platform. If Make.com can't do something natively, you can extend it.

Make.com Pricing: Is It Worth the Cost?

Plan Tiers & Core Limits

Make.com uses operations-based pricing – each action a module performs counts as an operation. This includes filters, routers, and data transformations, not just app actions.

Free
$0forever
  • 1,000 operations/month
  • 100 MB data transfer
  • 15-minute minimum interval
  • 2 active scenarios
  • All 3,000+ apps
Start Free
Core
$9per month
  • 10,000 operations/month
  • 1 GB data transfer
  • 15-minute minimum interval
  • 2 active scenarios
  • Basic support
Upgrade
Most Popular
Pro
$16per month
  • 10,000 operations/month
  • 5 GB data transfer
  • 5-minute minimum interval
  • Unlimited scenarios
  • Operations rollover
Go Pro

Value Assessment

The operations model rewards efficient scenario design. A well-built Make.com scenario often uses fewer operations than the equivalent in task-based competitors. The 2026 addition of rollover operations makes pricing more flexible.

Key considerations:

  • Free tier is generous for testing and small projects
  • Pro plan offers the best value with unlimited scenarios and rollover
  • Teams plan ($29/month) adds collaboration and 1-minute scheduling
  • Enterprise pricing scales with volume and includes dedicated support

Compared to Zapier's task-based pricing, Make.com often works out cheaper for complex automations that would require multiple "Zaps" elsewhere.

What Do Users Say? Pros & Cons

The Advantages

  1. Unmatched Visual Flexibility: The drag-and-drop builder excels for complex, branching logic. You can build automations that mirror real business processes, not just linear sequences.

  2. Powerful Custom Integration: HTTP modules and 3,000+ apps offer near-universal connectivity. We connected everything from 20-year-old ERP systems to cutting-edge AI APIs.

  3. Leading AI Integration: Native AI Agents (2026) provide a competitive edge. The visual integration of AI into workflows is genuinely innovative.

  4. Granular Control: Advanced error handling, data stores, and iterators give you precise control over every aspect of your automation.

  5. Excellent for Real-Time Automation: Robust webhook support means instant reactions to events. We built real-time dashboards that updated within seconds of source data changes.

  6. Scalable for Teams: Strong collaboration features and permission management support growing organizations.

  7. Developer-Friendly: The comprehensive API and custom code support create a perfect blend of no-code accessibility and developer power.

The Drawbacks

  1. Steeper Learning Curve: The visual power can be overwhelming initially. New users often struggle with concepts like routers and iterators.

  2. Pricing Complexity: Operations-based pricing requires careful monitoring. Complex scenarios can burn through operations faster than expected.

  3. Performance with Large Datasets: While stable, very large data processing (10,000+ records) requires optimization and batching strategies.

  4. Initial Setup Time: Building complex scenarios takes longer upfront than simpler tools. The investment pays off, but expect a learning period.

  5. Module-Specific Limitations: Some native app modules lack features available via direct API calls. You might need HTTP modules for advanced functionality.

Who Should Use Make.com?

Complex Multi-Path Business Processes

Scenario: A SaaS company needs to route leads based on multiple criteria (source, product interest, region, company size) to different CRM queues, notify specific Slack channels, and trigger personalized email sequences.

Make.com's routers and filters handle this elegantly. We built a similar system that evaluated 15 criteria and distributed leads to 8 different paths – maintaining and modifying it remains simple thanks to the visual interface.

Custom System Integration

Scenario: A manufacturing company needs to bridge their legacy on-premise database with modern cloud tools like Salesforce and Microsoft Teams.

Using HTTP modules, we connected a SOAP-based ERP system to Make.com, transforming XML data into JSON for modern apps. The visual debugging made troubleshooting integration issues much faster than code-based solutions.

Real-Time Data Processing Pipelines

Scenario: An e-commerce platform needs to ingest webhook data from Shopify, transform it, enrich it with customer data, and populate multiple analytics dashboards.

Make.com's webhook triggers and data transformation capabilities excel here. We processed over 50,000 events daily, maintaining sub-second response times for dashboard updates.

AI-Enhanced Workflows

Scenario: A support team wants to analyze incoming tickets, categorize sentiment, extract key information, and prioritize tickets before creating them in their helpdesk system.

With the new AI Agents, we built a system that reduced manual ticket triage by 70%. The AI analyzes content, detects urgency, and routes accordingly – all visible in the scenario's visual flow.

Internal Tool Building

Scenario: A team needs an approval system with multiple stakeholders, conditional escalation, and status tracking across projects.

Using Data Stores and advanced logic, we created a complete approval workflow without external databases. Team members interact via forms and emails while Make.com orchestrates the entire process.

Make.com vs. The Alternatives

Make.com vs. Zapier

Make.com's Edge:

  • Far superior visual logic and parallel processing
  • More powerful data manipulation tools
  • Often more cost-effective for complex automations
  • Better debugging with visual execution history

Zapier's Edge:

  • Simpler linear interface for basic automations
  • Larger template library
  • Stronger brand recognition
  • Easier for absolute beginners

For anything beyond simple A-to-B automations, Make.com wins decisively.

Make.com vs. n8n

Make.com's Edge:

  • More polished UI/UX
  • Managed cloud service (no hosting required)
  • Larger library of native integrations
  • Better documentation and support

n8n's Edge:

  • Open-source and self-hostable
  • Unlimited executions when self-hosted
  • More developer-oriented features
  • Can be more cost-effective at massive scale

Choose Make.com for ease of use and polish; choose n8n for complete control and unlimited scale.

Make.com vs. Microsoft Power Automate

Make.com's Edge:

  • Platform-agnostic (not tied to Microsoft 365)
  • Superior visual workflow builder
  • Better custom API integration
  • More flexible pricing

Power Automate's Edge:

  • Deep Microsoft ecosystem integration
  • Often included in existing licenses
  • Better for SharePoint/Teams automation
  • Enterprise governance features

Make.com wins for diverse tech stacks; Power Automate wins for Microsoft-centric organizations.

Make.com FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Conclusion: Should You Choose Make.com?

Final Assessment

After 8 months of intensive testing, Make.com stands out as the most powerful visual automation platform available. Its strengths – visual workflow building, advanced logic handling, custom API integration, and native AI Agents – create a unique combination that no competitor matches.

The platform excels at complex, multi-path automations that would be nightmarish to build and maintain in linear tools. The February 2026 AI Agents release extends this lead, bringing intelligent automation to the visual canvas in an unprecedented way.

However, this power comes with complexity. The learning curve is real, and the operations-based pricing requires attention. Simple automations might be overkill for Make.com's capabilities.

Our Recommendation

Best For
  • Teams building complex, branching automations
  • Businesses needing custom API integrations
  • Users requiring AI-enhanced workflows
  • Organizations with multi-path processes
Not Ideal For
  • Complete beginners to automation
  • Simple, linear workflow needs
  • Very high-volume operations on a budget
Pricing
Free$0 (1,000 ops)
Pro$16/mo

Choose Make.com if: You need complex, multi-path automations; require deep control and custom integrations; are building AI-enhanced workflows; or have outgrown simpler linear tools. The visual approach and advanced features justify the learning investment.

Consider an alternative if: Your automations are very simple and linear (try Zapier), you prioritize the absolute lowest learning curve, or you're deeply embedded in a specific ecosystem like Microsoft 365 (try Power Automate).

Winner: Make.com

Our Recommendation

For teams serious about automation, Make.com is the clear choice. The visual builder, advanced logic capabilities, and new AI features create possibilities that linear tools simply can't match.

Make.com isn't just another automation tool – it's a visual programming platform that happens to be accessible to non-developers. For organizations ready to move beyond simple integrations to true process automation, it's the most capable option available in 2026.

Ready to try Make.com?

Start your free trial today.